With reference to Indian History, the Members of the Constituent Assembly from the Provinces were
Contents16
- Adirectly elected by the people of those Provinces
- Bnominated by the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League
- Celected by the Provincial Legislative Assemblies
- Dselected by the Government for their expertise in constitutional matters
Show answer
Answer: (C) elected by the Provincial Legislative Assemblies
The Constituent Assembly was formed based on the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946.
Members from the Provinces were elected INDIRECTLY — they were elected by the members of the individual Provincial Legislative Assemblies (not directly by the general public).
Each province was allotted seats in proportion to its population, and members of the provincial legislatures voted to elect representatives to the Constituent Assembly.
Option (a) is wrong — there was no direct election by the people.
Option (b) is wrong — members were not simply nominated by parties.
Option (d) is wrong — they were not selected by the Government for expertise.
The indirect election method was chosen because holding direct elections across the entire country would have been impractical at that time.
(Source: DD Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India)
The Constituent Assembly was formed through indirect elections where Provincial Legislative Assembly members elected representatives, not through direct public voting.
This question tests understanding of the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946, which created the constitutional framework for India's transition to independence and established the method for forming the Constituent Assembly.
Cabinet Mission Plan 1946
Modern Indian History Cabinet Mission
Cabinet Mission Plan 1946: Constitutional Framework & UPSC Traps
Cabinet Mission Plan proposed federal structure with weak Centre and strong provinces
Rejected Pakistan as separate nation, proposed grouped provinces instead
Established Constituent Assembly with 389 members (292 from provinces, 93 from princely states, 4 from chief commissioners' provinces)
Interim Government formed in September 1946 under Nehru
The Cabinet Mission Plan was the final British attempt to transfer power while keeping India united. Sent in March 1946, the three-member mission proposed a complex federal structure to satisfy both Congress and Muslim League demands without partition.
Key Proposals
Aspect | Proposal | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Central Government | Weak Centre - only defence, foreign affairs, communications | Satisfy Muslim League's autonomy demands |
Provincial Grouping | Group A (Hindu-majority), Group B (Muslim-majority northwest), Group C (Muslim-majority northeast) | Alternative to Pakistan demand |
Constituent Assembly | 389 members elected indirectly by provincial legislatures | Proportional representation by population |
Interim Government | Executive Council with Indian members | Immediate transfer of administrative power |
Timeline of Events
%%{init: {"flowchart": {"wrappingWidth": 460}}}%%
flowchart TD
s1["`**March 1946**
Cabinet Mission arrives in India`"]
s2["`**May 1946**
Plan announced - federal structure with grouped provinces`"]
s3["`**June 1946**
Congress accepts plan conditionally, Muslim League accepts`"]
s4["`**July 1946**
Nehru's statement triggers Muslim League withdrawal`"]
s5["`**August 1946**
Direct Action Day called by Muslim League`"]
s6["`**September 1946**
Interim Government formed under Nehru`"]
s1 --> s2
s2 --> s3
s3 --> s4
s4 --> s5
s5 --> s6Why It Failed
Nehru's July statement that Congress would not be bound by grouping arrangements
Muslim League's withdrawal and call for Direct Action Day
Communal violence following Direct Action Day (August 16, 1946)
Fundamental disagreement on federal vs confederal structure
Trap: Cabinet Mission rejected Pakistan - it proposed grouped provinces instead
Trap: Plan proposed weak Centre, not strong central government like final Constitution
Trap: Both parties initially accepted the plan - failure came from implementation disputes
Trap: Mission had 3 members (Pethick-Lawrence, Cripps, Alexander), not just Cripps
Constituent Assembly Formation
Modern Indian History Constituent Assembly Provinces
Constituent Assembly Formation: Election Process & Composition
Members from provinces elected indirectly by Provincial Legislative Assemblies
389 total members: 292 provinces + 93 princely states + 4 chief commissioners' provinces
One member per million population as basic allocation principle
First meeting on December 9, 1946 with only 211 members present
The Constituent Assembly was formed based on indirect election - not direct voting by the people. Provincial Legislative Assembly members elected representatives in proportion to each community's population. This method was chosen because direct elections across British India would have been impractical in 1946.
Composition & Allocation
Source | Seats | Election Method | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
British Provinces | 292 | Indirect election by Provincial Legislative Assemblies | Proportional to population (1 per million) |
Princely States | 93 | Nomination by rulers | Proportional to population |
Chief Commissioners' Provinces | 4 | Nomination | Delhi, Ajmer-Merwara, Coorg, British Baluchistan |
Total | 389 | Mixed | Reduced to 299 after partition |
Electoral Process
# Constituent Assembly Elections
## Provincial Seats
- Provincial Legislative Assembly members vote
- Proportional representation
- Community-wise allocation
- July-August 1946 elections
## Princely States
- Rulers nominate representatives
- No elections
- Many initially stayed away
- Gradual integration
## Voting Method
- Single transferable vote
- Proportional representation
- Community quotas
- No direct public votingElection Results Impact
Congress won 208 seats out of 292 provincial seats
Muslim League won 73 seats but boycotted initial sessions
Partition reduced total strength from 389 to 299 members
Dr. Rajendra Prasad elected permanent President
B.R. Ambedkar chaired Drafting Committee
This question directly tests knowledge of the indirect election process. Many students incorrectly assume direct elections because modern assemblies use that method. The 1946 context made indirect election through provincial legislatures the practical choice.
Trap: NOT directly elected by people - this is the most common wrong answer
Trap: NOT nominated by Congress/Muslim League - they won seats through elections
Trap: NOT selected by Government for expertise - election was the method
Trap: Provincial Legislative Assembly members voted, not the general public
Provincial Legislative Assemblies 1946
Modern Indian History Provincial Legislative Assemblies
Provincial Legislative Assemblies 1946: Structure & Powers
Established under Government of India Act 1935 with expanded franchise
11 provinces had legislative assemblies with provincial autonomy
Communal representation continued with separate electorates
These assemblies elected Constituent Assembly members in 1946
Provincial Legislative Assemblies under the 1935 Act were the immediate predecessors to the Constituent Assembly. They had gained significant powers and represented the most democratic institutions in British India by 1946, making them the logical choice to elect constitutional framers.
Key Features vs Earlier System
Aspect | Before 1935 | After 1935 Act | Significance for 1946 |
|---|---|---|---|
Provincial Powers | Diarchy system | Full provincial autonomy | Mature democratic experience |
Franchise | Very limited | 30 million voters | Broader representation |
Subjects | Reserved/transferred | Complete provincial list | Real governance experience |
Elections | 1920, 1923, 1926 | 1937, 1946 | Fresh mandate for constitution-making |
1946 Electoral Context
# 1946 Provincial Elections
## Congress Performance
- Won 8 out of 11 provinces
- Clear majority in most
- Strong position for Constituent Assembly
## Muslim League
- Swept Muslim seats
- Proved representative character
- Basis for Pakistan demand
## Electoral System
- Separate electorates continued
- Communal representation
- Limited franchise (30 million)
## Constitutional Impact
- Legitimacy for Constituent Assembly
- Democratic mandate
- Indirect election methodWhy This Method Was Chosen
Practical necessity - direct elections across British India would take too long
Democratic legitimacy - provincial assemblies had fresh 1946 mandate
Experience factor - assembly members understood governance and law-making
Proportional representation possible through single transferable vote system
Trap: Don't confuse 1937 elections (first under 1935 Act) with 1946 elections (pre-independence)
Trap: Provincial assemblies had real powers under 1935 Act, not just advisory roles
Trap: Separate electorates continued in 1946 - communal representation wasn't ended yet
Trap: These were British Indian provinces, not princely states which had different arrangement
Interim Government 1946-47
Modern Indian History
Interim Government 1946-47: Transition to Independence
Formed in September 1946 under Jawaharlal Nehru as Vice-President
Muslim League joined in October 1946 but remained non-cooperative
Functioned as Executive Council under Viceroy Wavell, later Mountbatten
Lasted until August 15, 1947 and partition
The Interim Government was the immediate administrative bridge between British rule and independence. Formed as part of the Cabinet Mission Plan, it gave Indians executive experience while constitutional discussions continued through the Constituent Assembly.
Composition & Key Members
Position | Leader | Party | Portfolio |
|---|---|---|---|
Vice-President | Jawaharlal Nehru | Congress | External Affairs & Commonwealth Relations |
Home Member | Sardar Patel | Congress | Home, Information & Broadcasting |
Finance Member | Liaquat Ali Khan | Muslim League | Finance |
Defence Member | Baldev Singh | Congress | Defence |
Law Member | Jogendra Nath Mandal | Muslim League | Law |
Formation Timeline
%%{init: {"flowchart": {"wrappingWidth": 460}}}%%
flowchart TD
s1["`**August 1946**
Viceroy invites Congress to form government`"]
s2["`**September 2, 1946**
Congress interim government sworn in under Nehru`"]
s3["`**October 1946**
Muslim League decides to join government`"]
s4["`**October 26, 1946**
League members inducted, but remain non-cooperative`"]
s5["`**March 1947**
Mountbatten replaces Wavell as Viceroy`"]
s6["`**August 15, 1947**
Transfer of power - interim government ends`"]
s1 --> s2
s2 --> s3
s3 --> s4
s4 --> s5
s5 --> s6Challenges & Functioning
Non-cooperation by Muslim League - attended meetings but opposed Congress decisions
Administrative continuity - British civil service remained but Indians held key portfolios
Partition preparations - government had to manage both unity and division plans
Communal tensions - Direct Action Day aftermath affected governance
Limited powers - Viceroy retained ultimate authority, especially over defence
Trap: Nehru was Vice-President, not President (Viceroy remained head)
Trap: Muslim League joined the government but remained non-cooperative
Trap: Government lasted 11 months (Sept 1946 - Aug 1947), not just a few weeks
Trap: Liaquat Ali Khan held Finance, the most powerful economic portfolio